Skip to content (access key 's')
Logo of Technion
Logo of CS Department
Logo of CS4People

The Taub Faculty of Computer Science Events and Talks

Smaller Footprint for Java Collections
event speaker icon
Yuval Shimron (M.Sc. Thesis Seminar)
event date icon
Wednesday, 15.06.2011, 14:00
event location icon
Taub 601
event speaker icon
Advisor: Prof. Yossi Gil
In dealing with the container bloat problem, we identify five memory compaction techniques, which can be used to reduce the footprint of the small objects that make these containers. Using these techniques, we describe two alternative methods for more efficient encoding of the JRE's ubiquitous HashMap data structure, and present a mathematical model in which the footprint of this can be analyzed. First of this is our fused-hashing encoding method, which reduces memory overhead by 20%-40% on a 32-bit environment and 45%-65% on a 64-bit environment. This encoding guarantees these figures as lower bound regardless of the distribution of keys in hash buckets. Second, our more opportunistic squashed-hashing, achieves expected savings of 25%-70% on a 32-bit environment and 30%-75% on a 64-bit environments, but these savings can degrade and are not guaranteed against bad (and unlikely) distribution of keys to buckets. Timing results indicate that squashed hashing generally improves the SPECjbb2005 benchmark, but some of the operations, particularly removals and iterations are slow. We still find squashed hashing is faster then the baseline implementation for large tables indexed by Integers. We note that with the use of our compaction techniques, there is merit in an implementation of HashSet which is distinct from that of HashMap. For TreeMap we show two encodings which reduces the overhead of tree nodes by ~43%, ~46% on a 32-bit environment and ~55%, ~73% on a 64-bit environment. These compactions also give a reason to separating the implementation of TreeSet from that of TreeMap. A separete implementation is expected to increase the footprint reduction to ~59%, ~54% on a 32-bit environment and ~61%, ~75% on a 64-bit environment.